Economic Parables

What Jesus says about the Economy...... Learn about discipleship in our global economy..... Find a biblical basis to survive the recession....and live more richly!

BLOG

Just What onEarth is a Conservative?

Posted by dcowan on January 3, 2012 at 7:30 AM

 

By David Cowan

 

Iowa is upon us. 2012 is upon us. How will it all end? It may just all end in tears. Tears because Obama wins, or tears because the GOP did not offer a viable alternative. Whatever happens, one thing is for sure: this is a time to standup for conservative principles.

 

But, just what on earth is a conservative, and can one win the White House this year?

 

To answer this means agreement on just what a conservative is, and your answer to the second part of my question depends on the answer to the first part.

 

Simply put, Conservatism is a set of instincts and principles guiding decisions, which are applied accordingto historical context. Today’s conservative may discuss different situations and policy options then an 18th Century conservative, but then they will adhere to some broad principles as if there had been no intervening centuries. The conservative whom is central to American modern conservatism is Edmund Burke, and he spelled out some core conservative elements of thought:

 

(1) People are basically religious, and religion is the foundation of civil society. A divine sanction infuses the legitimate, existing, social order.

 

(2) Society is the natural, organic product of slow historical growth, with institutions drawing on the wisdom of previous generations.

 

(3) People are creatures of instinct and emotion as well as reason. Prudence, prejudice, experience, and habit are better guides than reason, logic, abstractions, and metaphysics. Truth exists not in universal propositions but in concrete experiences.

 

(4) The community is superior to the individual. Rights derive from duties. Evil isrooted in human nature, not in any particular social institutions.

 

(5) Apart from an ultimate moral sense, people are unequal. Social organization is a complex of classes, orders, and groups. Hence, differentiation, hierarchy and leadership are the inevitable characteristics of any civil society.

 

(6)A presumption exists "in favor of any settled scheme of government againstany untried project.  “Man's hopes arehigh, but his vision is short.”  Thus,efforts to remedy existing evils usually result in even greater ones.

 

We find echoes of these elements in the influential 1953 essay “The Conservative Mind”,where Russell Kirk offered what he called “six canons of conservative thought”. Like Burke, the divine plays a foundational role:

 

1.   Belief that a divine intent rules society as well as conscience

 

2.   Affection for the proliferating variety and mystery of traditional life

 

3.   Conviction that civilized society requires orders and classes

 

4.   Persuasion that property and freedom are inseparably connected and that economic leveling is not economic progress

 

5.   Faith in prescription and distrust of “sophisters and calculators”

 

6.   Recognition that change and reform are not identical

 

In 2012, how many of these foundational canons of thought are taught in our educational system? Again the answer is simple: none. What does happen is that these foundational principles are undermined and dismantled at every level of education and public life. To be a conservative is to swim against the cultural tide, against the consensus which is taught in schools and parlayed by the chattering media.

 

Winning a political election means appealing to the consensus, and today’s consensus is not tolerant of principles, or even thought for that matter. In today’s climate, a conservative cannot win the election. You can only look at the GOP field and vote for the consensus candidate, in other words the nearest thing to an electable conservative. This is not a ringing endorsement of Mitt Romney, but he is the only candidate who can compete with Obama.

 

But then in the grand scheme of things the presidential election is a mere sideshow, becausethe real battles lie ahead in establishing a new conservative agenda for an America systemically in doubt and unsure. The enlightenment trajectory of Europe, with its self-destructive repudiation of civilized principles, is the trajectory America is now following.

 

The answer is not to be found in this election, a new conservatism that tackles the causes of decline in enlightenment civilization is needed. A new Burke or Kirk is needed, because conservatives cannot simply look at Obama as the cause of America’s identity crisis, he is a symptom of the decay of the principles these thinkers set out so clearly.


 

Categories: None

Post a Comment

Oops!

Oops, you forgot something.

Oops!

The words you entered did not match the given text. Please try again.

Already a member? Sign In

1 Comment

Reply VCSimpson
12:53 AM on February 17, 2012 
If you accept Russell Kirk's definition, Mitt Romney is, indeed, a conservative --- and one who can be elected in 2012. For some time the Republican Party has been co-opted by those who are not conservatives at all in the sense that Burke or Kirk defined, but instead have a taliban-like mindset of judging others on the basis of their narrow religious and personal ideologies. Conservatism is shaped by a sense of higher purpose and divine intent, but certainly not by the interference of public policy in the private practice of how one serves that higher purpose or actualizes ones own spiritual life. The more we allow the GOP to focus on personal/private issues --- issues that are truly matters of conscience and strictly between an individual and his God --- the farther we get from conservativism, traditional republicanism, the small/non-interventionist government which serves liberty --- and victory at the polls. We are in danger when we replace our Constitution and our personal accountability with litmus tests about private matters. Only Romney holds to true conservative principals and really sees himself as a servant of the people. Gingrich is a narcissistic hack, Santorum is a sad little throwback to a paternalistic authoritarian world of yesteryear, Paul is an entertaining old man with no grasp of the world's realities --- and all three lay claim to conservatism without ever grasping its meaning, and in the claiming, do it damage.

Follow me on Twitter

White House 2012 Blog

Facebook Fanpage Box

Facebook Fanpage Box